2010-04-09

Tablets, Apple, control, and the future of casual pixels.

On Facebook i just had a interaction typical of many online about, and over the IPad. Funny that i'd have an opinion about an IPad given i don't even use a mac. But I do.

So pardon this wordy ramble.

I'm optimistic. Not converted per say, but i recognize the Ipad's significance. There's no denying it presents a viable way out for big segments of the print media. Not to be what they were maybe, but to be something? As a comic artist looking to improve the way i can get my work out there, i see a lot of potential in these things. And from the list of things not allowed...

...well unless i want to make porn i don't see that affecting me too badly. I don't really care to make porn no.

I can see how it chafes if you do, but we're not talking about the entire digital market here. More like one outlet store chain? And I doubt the device is perfect at all. For a breakdown of the IPads flaws far more informed than i could offer, i like the thoroughness of Cory's at boingboing - and he links to some others worth looking at as well.

Many users are going to love it just the same - but if you're root, a creator or maker, you're going to want more. I do.

Those with the spare $ for a IPad as a casual device will get one anyway - heck the thing can last 10+ hours on a charge and do VIOP, kicks my old N800 all to hell and that was pretty nice. If i have the spare change in the future i'm there. But it's not going to work for everyone all the time. And i don't think that's their idea. That might be what YOU wanted, but not Steve. Xeni Jardin's first blush reaction to it shows how something like this was always a great idea with a waiting and ready market. It's clear this thing is a Win for them, and i think for me too as a comic artist and illustrator. And I think it's going to be a perfect brick for wedging the door open on digital media devices with the same kind of practical form factor.

A market leader, a trend setter, but the long run owner of the game?

Someone finally getting the hardware this right though, is going to make the future brighter for this kind of machine. And that's going to make any free market or speech concerns mute as more and more of these devices come into play. Eventually someone has always matched a mac with an open platform if not in market shares. It's only a mater of time.

If you really want to push the issue of market or speech, then do it in the community and the court, and even use the device to make a statement. But don't expect a device and it's support infrastructure to be the root of liberalizing culture. People do that, not machines. If i draw an X rated comic in print today, i have to deal with the same things app makers are, in brick and mortar retailers all the time. And customs! I don't hear extreme examples in the stories about Apple's shop and if that's all i had to contend with, i think it's quite possible to manage a new booming market for magazines and comics there. Not saying don't critique Steve, he does read Penthouse it seems. But lets keep it in perspective?

I don't want shops to stop being able to have a say about what they sell on their own shelves for the sake of free speech, be they made of mater or pixels. That's just trading intolerances.

Not even a question of capitalism to me. The change that means anything, is that of the cultural standards that inform the consumers who influence retailers.

The best way there is not in their face, but through the back door, via content they will listen to.

So i think the IStore is overblown as a censorship threat - They just reflect the middle moral ground of the american market - There lays the problem, not at apple.

And really I don't expect to see vibrators and blow up dolls at Toys'R'us either. Or less extreme - a larger mens section in a women's clothing store. Not going to happen is it? It's not practical.

Apple may be chasing the largest market there is, but it's not the whole market is it? And so? Just leaves what, 90% of what dominates the internet open to being exploited still? This is bad how? For who? And that i can go somewhere digitally and not have to wade through stuff like this? I like brick in mortar shops like that i have to say. Bit less crass is not always so bad you know. Not my favorite part of the internet exactly. Not the worst, but hey.

Hardware wise, i think the Ipad is a case of low hanging fruit, and they were able to pick it first with the usual apple flair. The touch screen tech and limitations in thinking regarding interface were holding tablets back the last 10 years - geeks loved keyboards, Gates only just flipped on the question - but since before Star Trek sleek slate computers have always been a dream desire. And because of that this has been one of the more thoroughly explored format ideas. We've had our model T and a few more since. The larger hybrid tablet laptops and IPhone have both explored the possibilities here more than tentatively. So while the reality of it may be a little mind blowing, it's not quite something all together new.

The control Apple exerts over it is pretty fragile too. More of an evelitonay influence than a regime. The Iphone OS being the system means not just a built in sweet of apps from the smaller cousins ready to go out of the gates.

It also means the Ipad is all but already hacked 6 ways to Sunday. There are going to be keen geeks who will train their little tablets to dance and say mama just for the bragging rights.

More than a few companies are cracking the technical problems of battery life, leaner OS's, and touch based interfaces with different approaches. Others with less interest in tightly controlling content, or even having a 'store' will be the rest of the market in the long run - Apple itself is bound to come up with a souped up pad running OS X, the HP Slate specs and price point almost guaranties it. Why leave that part of their less casual market completely unexplored?

The IPad looks to me like a fantastic dynamic proof of concept you can own today - sounds like a sales pitch don't it?

But i have to roll my eye's when the drama gets overplayed. Some rather intense arguing going on about it from what I've seen. From the Coming of the Tablet to dark talk of Fascism and Monopoly, like they have already cornered and own the market or something? The market is still just being invented here - I think they are still just one player with fairly modest goals in terms of what they want this device and it's a 1.0 for them.

It's a cheep stripped down version of what's to come, that has a pretty secure income stream built in - and that IS something people have been wanting. It looks like it does what it said it would do really really well. Most people will be able to afford to take one for granted.

But i'd put money on Cory being right. That the real fun is going to be the open format versions of what follows. Where we will really see what tablets can do. Simply because that is where the experimentation is naturally going to be.

That the IPad is such a 'perfect' performing little bastard will make the game all the more fun. Like the left needed Bush, geeks need IBM and Apple's to retaliate and one-up against. Working so well, the first thing hardcore users will see are all the things it might do, once cracked. :)

Apple will likely continue to be good at offering luxury goods to people who don't really care much about or want to know how it operates unless that = simply. I'm not being condescending, many believe in and pursue push button convenience and the freedom to conform. I don't think it's that they are incapable of more. No. Being lazy is a state of mind, not of nature. I've been lazy and so have you. Question is just how lazy and when. And then Apple has you covered in the modernist clean inoffensive style of the minimal. The slickest of cutting edge recycled electronic goods. For now, for that game - they are the Kings of it - all hail apple.

Whatever, I converted to a home built PC in the 90's and never looked back yet. :P
But as a content provider, when it comes to a broadly commercially viable comics market, taking root 'online' POST collector era that will support a salary? In a post pirate bay world? it's a good platform to start with i'm going to bet.

Labels: , , , , ,

posted by max at 4/09/2010 10:12:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2010-03-31

The wing nut's wing nuts are on the wing. But they can't outrun Rachel Maddow!

So I just want to say, when we depicted the end times in Therefore Repent, i didn't mean to say i belive in it! Nooooo, not even a little. We were taking the piss. But these crazy guys!! Fuck!!! Holy crap, you can't write it this bad. Check out the patch. Man.

But they could not outrun Rachel Maddow. Nice. If there were a god that would mean he watches her.

Good old Michigan. Don't you guys play in our rain dear games. Not unless you got some antlers.

Labels: , , , , ,

posted by max at 3/31/2010 09:53:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2008-07-01

a film about the roerich garden project in montreal

Found this on you tube about a project by a local artist i know. Emily Rose Michaud & company built it in the winter. Miss Janet made this excellent 6 min doc about the day Emily and a team of volunteers set it up together over the course of one very cold day. The Garden lived on, you can keep up with their progress here. It's pretty damn cool.

Labels: , , , , , ,

posted by max at 7/01/2008 11:23:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-09-10

This is cool...

posted by max at 9/10/2007 12:26:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-08-11

Cool....

posted by max at 8/11/2007 07:17:00 AM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-08-05

Dream Life 002 [formally 001]

002

Been taking it easy but for me that still means making art most of the time. Made first dent in the rock that is the next project, feeling pretty good about that. So, This is PG 1 of my next book.

This is full bleed art, the book will be 8.5"x10", i think B&W. It was done with Pebeo encre de chine ink, Pelikan White Gouache, and a cheep #2 brush. Kind of sick of pens for a bit right now - what i used mostly to draw the last 154 pages of art. This is slow, but it's were im at right now so...

I was inspired for the this sequence in the book by
two sets of photos, one recent pictures taken of the sun, the other of deep sea life around volcanic vents. The set will run for 4 pages contrasting the two settings then move into a dream sequence.

Labels: , , ,

posted by max at 8/05/2007 12:59:00 AM 1 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-04-18

Pin City on Comic Space

Pin City


Pin City is a fraction of a novel. Something started a while back, and had to put down to pay the bills for a bit. It's apreaed in print in RevolveR.

Still working on the script and expect to return to it in 2009. For now, enjoy this prologue tale of a tale,set in a not too far future..

Labels: , , , , ,

posted by max at 4/18/2007 05:21:00 AM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-02-27

have a chat with your future self for just 9.95 a minute...

posted by max at 2/27/2007 07:24:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-02-19

They painted it green....





photos care of hinews.cn

Labels: ,

posted by max at 2/19/2007 11:25:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-02-13

Moore zip in the chips

posted by max at 2/13/2007 07:35:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

Radical Self Revelations

A few entries back i posted a link to this interesting invitation from Clive Thompson on collisiondetection.net.

Radical Transparency has been one of those ideas that's wandered about in the back of my head for a long time, and i remain pretty conflicted about the idea.

On one hand I have lived a portion of my life online for going on 14 yrs now.

Computer camp to Bulletin boards to email to the web I was not much more than a dabbler till around 99, but from then on it's been a significant part of my carrier as a artist to use this forum as the primary way of getting my work out into the world.

In part it's also why I've had a not so secret identity - a bit of a joke with myself and a bit of a shield for the ego to make dealing with the ups and downs of self-promoting a bit more manageable.

I've fumbled around the balance of public and privet and tend it seems to favour privacy in my own life.

At first this was a consequence of minimizing my self-conscious embarrassment over the obvious side effects of being dyslexic - even with the red lines, revealed & reviled still look
at times the same to me.

But over time
I've also had to discover where my comfort zone
for being any kind of public personality lay.

I've had missteps and resolved a lot of questions for myself about this, and it remains an issue that captures my wandering attentions frequently.

I've also watched as people around me have revealed themselves via the net, to varying degrees, with all kinds of unexpected and not always good consequences.

Objectively - and there fore abstractly - I have come to prefer the ideal of Radical Transparency in our civic lives without question.

But I just read this very interesting article by Emily Nussbaum [thanks again to Clive for the link].

A whole other kettle to me.

But maybe a un self-conscious self-aware upright naked ape is just what the doctor ordered.

Maybe this is the cultural evolution the revolution failed to bring.

I don't know,
I-m not committed to that line of thought,
but it has the taste to me
of a bit of prophecy.



Labels: , ,

posted by max at 2/13/2007 02:12:00 AM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-02-07

just in case you missed this....

From Nature

Fourth round of IPCC pins down blame for global warming


In what may be the most eagerly awaited weather forecast of all time, the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) today released its most recent assessment of the state of climate change around the world.

The report, a consensus document put together by 600 scientists and agreed by representatives of 113 countries, predicts continued warming of 0.2 ℃ per decade for the coming few decades.

Over the twenty-first century it predicts a range of 1.1-2.9 ℃ warming in a scenario with low emissions of greenhouse gases, and 2.4-6.4 ℃ in a high-emissions scenario. The warming is expected to be greatest over land and in the north, and the chance of heat-waves increasing in frequency is greater than 90%.

Labels: , ,

posted by max at 2/07/2007 07:43:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

The Will Eisner Movie

Oh, now this is a film i'm going to Have to see...



more here

Labels: , ,

posted by max at 2/07/2007 03:19:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-02-05

Secrecy Is Dead
Tap The Hivemind
Reputation Is Everything

Reads like a Warren Ellis post eh?

It's from an interesting invitation from Clive Thompson at Collision detection
- got me thinking, but so far i have not had time to write anything down myself :p

Actually I would not be surprised if Clive will talk to Warren for a piece like this if he gets onto the ways cyber punk fiction has forecasted these trends and clashes between secrecy and freedom of information on the net.

Certainly something I've been thinking about.

Labels: , , , ,

posted by max at 2/05/2007 02:49:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-01-28

Rochdale College Museum

Everything you might have wanted to know about one of the more colorful chapters in Canadian history.

Labels: ,

posted by max at 1/28/2007 03:59:00 AM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

Life logging?

Here's an interesting post Internet life experience for you, coming across photos of yourself taken either unbeknownst to you, or before you can really remember exactly, both posted by complete strangers on flickr!

Labels: , ,

posted by max at 1/28/2007 03:04:00 AM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-01-25

Nancy Pelosi vs George W. Bush, re his 'plan'

posted by max at 1/25/2007 10:27:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-01-17

Tech

posted by max at 1/17/2007 04:22:00 AM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-01-16

shocker...

posted by max at 1/16/2007 03:35:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2007-01-05

last of first snow - MTL Jan 2007


last of first snow - MTL Jan 2007, originally uploaded by Maxim.


so....whats wrong with this picture?

hmmm?

Labels: ,

posted by max at 1/05/2007 11:52:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

There is always hope on the horizon

Barack_Obama & Hillary_Rodham_Clinton

So yah, imagine them as a double bill? Clinton has the greater experience and popular appeal, so she'd get top job for sure, with Obama as vp?

that would be interesting.

Labels:

posted by max at 1/05/2007 10:10:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2006-12-24

What i wish for x-mass



Not something santa could do anything about, but you can.

Labels:

posted by max at 12/24/2006 11:46:00 AM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2006-12-06

14

Today marks the 17th anniversary of the death of 14 women, shot dead at Ecole Polytechnique.

Genevieve Bergeron
Helene Colgan
Natalie Croteau
Barbara Daigneault
Anne-Marie Edward
Maud Haviernick
Barbara Marie Klueznick
Maryse Laganiere
Maryse Leclair
Anne-Marie Lemay
Michelle Richard
Sonia Pelletier
Annie Saint-Arnault
Annie Turcotte

This morning when I woke, the clock radio was tuned to the CBC as usual, and Sounds Like Canada host Shelagh Rogers was talking to three people who had called in responses to a segment from the day before, about the book Remembering Women Murdered by Men. One of the thoughts that was expressed by two of today's guest was a general unease with the title of the book itself. No one wanted to say it was wrong -the numbers are unquestionable.

But at the same time, the title seemed to make even Shelagh and one of the female callers a bit uncomfortable. It seemed to sit as not quite right to them, and thinking on it I think I have a theory as to why.

I think that it needs to be acknowledged first, that while rare, it does happen that physically abusive behaviour in relationships is sometimes perpetrated by women, and emotional abuse is common enough from both sexes. I think those exceptions help to illustrate that the problem has very little to do with anything hard wired. I think it's a gendered problem. As in the rolls assumed to be conventionally appropriate to men and women based on their sex. Its about dominance games, and the acceptance of our opposite sex as true peers, and not the other side from another planet.

In the end I agree with Shelagh's guests, who concluded that the book title is not objectionable, but makes them uneasy somehow. I think we need to listen to the twinge they had, and I do as well, whenever we feel this problem is being simplified in a way that may undermine finding a solution.

The book title works well to do what it should; Making us think about this truth and begin to ask questions. But we should not let it simplify our view of the real problem.

And I think that problem is the popular notion of dealing with the opposite sex as an alien species, one that needs to be controlled or held at arms length, and put down, either literally or metaphorically when it's seen as out of line. It seems to me this common model will inevitably lead to abuse regardless if the one holding those ideas is a man or a woman.

The truth is that so far, as far as we know there are very few real behavioural differences hardwired into the sexes, and that many of those we take for granted as being male or female are as much the result of social conditioning and roll playing as biological gender.

These ideas are pervasive because of the way people are raised, not wired. They are taught to see the opposite sex. And this is the responsibility of both sexes, of society as a whole, not just men. And they can change.

So for today that's my two cents. Take a moment to think about all the assumptions you tend to hold about the opposite sex, and really everyone else while were at it, and question why you would think they would apply to all individuals.

Why is it that we tend as a society to be so reluctant to take on a little more work in our day to day dealing with each other, by putting aside our time saving assumptions and actually get to know the others that you meet. Are we really that lazy?

Labels:

posted by max at 12/06/2006 12:02:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Stumble It!

2006-09-25

A friends insights

My friend Cassandra has just started classes at Concordia in the arts program, she's studying performance art, as so has quite an interesting range of classes.

When we can find some time to spend together she often has interesting experiences to relay to me from her classes. Some has been of the too predictable Art School egomania and competition, but a lot has been more interesting and at times she's enjoyed some profound moments.

She's posted one account of these on her blog here, the post titled Judgments and Class Discussions - Found her post refreshing commentary and view of the incidents earlier this month at Dawson, which neighbours Concordia's campus in downtown Montreal.

It's too true, our culture, our species still is too easily led and prone to react in astonishment and disbelief, followed by protectionist fear when things like this go down. We push further away those we push away daily, and when our society gets colder, our media echoes the cries of many people astonishment that the obvious happens.

Gill illustrated a point in his randomish choice of targets: Any human behaviour can happen in any Human space, including the most selfish violet lashing out of the ostracized.

Gill saw himself as a dark figure, but none of us is the sole author of our self-image. Rather it's a by-product of both the way we see ourselves, and the way others do and respond to that. Somewhere along the line others helped to project this persona on him, and others still helped to confirm it time and again. Eventually he simply did what all humans do, he acted out his perceived roll in life.

This truth should not make you fearful, but respect the consequences of taking things for granted, and of pre-judging.

It's true that instinctively humans will make conscious and unconscious judgements about others within the first 10 seconds of having met. But we also posses one of the most powerful thinking devices in the known universe, and are quite able to use it to stay off that judgement till we know more, and even better.

Labels:

posted by max at 9/25/2006 11:26:00 PM 0 comments

Stumble It!



Sadax Golum. Get yours at bighugelabs.com/flickr